Tag Archive for: VA accreditation

Veterans seeking assistance with a VA disability claim may encounter companies promising faster approvals, higher ratings or substantial benefit increases.

Before signing an agreement or paying for assistance, verify that the person offering help is accredited by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

VA accreditation is intended to ensure that representatives understand the benefits process, meet federal requirements and remain accountable for their conduct.

Who Can Become VA Accredited?

VA may accredit:

  • Attorneys
  • Claims agents
  • Representatives of recognized veterans service organizations

Veterans service organization representatives often provide claims assistance at no cost. Accredited attorneys and claims agents may charge fees in certain circumstances permitted by federal law, generally after VA has issued an initial decision and the matter has entered a review or appeal stage.

A company name, professional-looking website or claim of “veteran expertise” does not establish VA accreditation.

Accreditation applies to an individual—not simply to the business employing that person.

How to Verify Accreditation

The VA Office of General Counsel maintains an online database of accredited attorneys, claims agents and veterans service organization representatives.

To check a representative:

  1. Open the VA accreditation search.
  2. Select the appropriate type of representative.
  3. Enter the individual’s name.
  4. Review the search results carefully.
  5. Confirm that the person’s location and contact information match the individual offering assistance.

Search the VA Accreditation Database

If the person does not appear in the database, ask for clarification before sharing records, signing an agreement or paying a fee.

Warning Signs to Watch For

Veterans should proceed cautiously when a company or consultant:

  • Guarantees a particular disability rating
  • Promises an approval or specific payment amount
  • Charges a large upfront fee
  • Demands a percentage or multiple of future benefits
  • Refuses to identify the accredited individual handling the claim
  • Pressures the veteran to sign immediately
  • Requests login credentials for a VA account
  • Directs the veteran to provide inaccurate or exaggerated information
  • Claims VA accreditation is unnecessary
  • Uses confusing contracts or does not clearly explain its fees

No representative can guarantee the outcome of a VA disability claim.

Understand the Fee Agreement

Before agreeing to paid representation, veterans should request a complete written explanation of:

  • The services being provided
  • The person responsible for the work
  • Whether that person is VA accredited
  • When fees will be charged
  • How the fee is calculated
  • Whether additional expenses may be assessed
  • How the agreement can be terminated
  • What happens if the claim is unsuccessful

Veterans should keep copies of all contracts, correspondence, invoices and records provided to the company.

A fee that is based on future benefits can become far more expensive than it initially appears.

Free Assistance May Be Available

Veterans may be able to receive free help with an initial VA claim through:

  • VA-accredited veterans service organizations
  • State and local veterans affairs offices
  • County or parish veterans service officers
  • Other recognized nonprofit organizations

Complex appeals and legal matters may require assistance from an accredited attorney or claims agent. Veterans should still verify accreditation and review the fee agreement before proceeding.

What Are “Claim Sharks”?

The term “claim shark” is commonly used by veterans advocates to describe unaccredited companies that charge veterans substantial fees for assistance with VA disability claims.

These businesses may describe their services as coaching, consulting, medical coordination or education rather than legal representation. Changing the label does not necessarily eliminate the risks.

Unaccredited companies may not be subject to the same training, oversight and accountability requirements as VA-accredited representatives.

Why MVA Is Addressing This Issue

Military-Veterans Advocacy has worked to protect veterans from predatory claims practices through litigation, legislation and public education.

In Military-Veterans Advocacy, Inc. v. Landry, a federal court struck down a Louisiana law that sought to authorize a state system for paid veterans’ claims consulting. The ruling reinforced the importance of federal standards governing claims representation.

Read About MVA’s Federal Court Victory in MVA v. Landry.

Veterans earned their benefits through service. They should not lose a significant portion of those benefits to an unqualified or unaccountable company.

Before paying anyone for VA claim assistance, verify the individual’s accreditation, understand the agreement and ask questions.

This article provides general educational information and does not constitute legal advice. Rules governing VA representation and fees depend on the circumstances of each matter.

Military-Veterans Advocacy secured a major victory for veterans when a federal court struck down Louisiana’s Preserving Lawful Utilization of Services for Veterans Act, commonly known as the PLUS Act.

In Military-Veterans Advocacy, Inc. v. Landry, U.S. District Judge Brian A. Jackson granted summary judgment against the state, finding that key provisions of the law were unconstitutional.

The ruling reinforces the importance of federal standards governing who may assist veterans with VA disability claims and when fees may be charged.

What Was the Louisiana PLUS Act?

The Louisiana Legislature passed the PLUS Act in 2024.

The law sought to establish a state framework allowing private claims-consulting companies to charge veterans for assistance with VA disability claims. These companies may operate without the accreditation, training and oversight required of representatives formally recognized by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Some claims consultants charge fees based on the additional benefits a veteran receives. Under the Louisiana law, those charges could reach thousands of dollars.

MVA challenged the law because veterans’ benefits representation is governed by federal law and because the state’s approach risked undermining protections created for veterans.

Why VA Accreditation Matters

VA-accredited attorneys, claims agents and veterans service organization representatives must meet federal requirements designed to protect veterans.

Accreditation helps ensure that representatives:

  • Understand the VA claims and appeals process
  • Meet applicable character and competency requirements
  • Follow federal rules governing representation
  • Remain accountable for their conduct
  • Comply with restrictions on when and how fees may be charged

Many accredited veterans service organizations provide initial claims assistance at no cost. Accredited attorneys and claims agents may generally charge fees only under circumstances permitted by federal law, often after VA has issued an initial decision and the matter has entered the review or appeals process.

Unaccredited consulting companies do not necessarily operate under the same standards or accountability.

What the Federal Court Decided

The court found that the Louisiana PLUS Act conflicted with federal law regulating assistance with veterans’ disability claims.

Judge Jackson ruled that federal law superseded the Louisiana statute under the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution. The court found that the state law interfered with Congress’s objective of ensuring that veterans have access to qualified representatives when pursuing VA benefits.

The court also found that a mandatory disclosure provision violated the First Amendment because it compelled speech without an adequate factual basis.

The disclosure required claims consultants and attorneys to tell clients that the same services were available at no cost through the Louisiana Department of Veterans Affairs or veterans service organizations. The court recognized that this statement did not accurately reflect every type of service, particularly complex legal representation involving appeals.

Why the Decision Matters for Veterans

Veterans seeking disability benefits are often navigating serious illnesses, financial strain and an extremely complicated claims system. They should be able to trust that individuals offering assistance are qualified, accountable and following federal law.

The ruling matters because it:

  • Reinforces federal oversight of veterans’ claims representation
  • Protects the role of VA accreditation
  • Challenges state efforts to authorize unaccredited claims consulting
  • Recognizes the difference between basic claims assistance and complex legal representation
  • Helps preserve safeguards intended to protect veterans from excessive fees and misleading practices

The decision does not eliminate unaccredited claims consulting nationwide. Enforcement gaps remain, and similar policy debates continue at both the state and federal levels.

MVA’s Continuing Fight Against Claim Sharks

MVA has worked to educate veterans and lawmakers about companies that charge large fees for assistance with disability claims while operating outside the VA accreditation system.

These companies are frequently called “claim sharks” by veterans advocates because their fees can consume a significant portion of the benefits awarded to a disabled veteran.

MVA supports strong protections for veterans, meaningful enforcement of federal standards and access to qualified assistance throughout the claims and appeals process.

Strategic Litigation Protects More Than One Veteran

MVA v. Landry demonstrates why systemic litigation is an important part of Military-Veterans Advocacy’s mission.

A court case addressing a state law or government policy can protect far more than a single claimant. It can clarify legal standards, prevent harmful practices and preserve safeguards for veterans across an entire jurisdiction.

MVA will continue using litigation, legislation and education to defend veterans’ earned rights and promote accountability within the benefits system.

[Read the Federal Court’s Ruling.]

Learn more about MVA’s litigation.

Support Military-Veterans Advocacy.

This article is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Veterans seeking assistance with a VA claim should confirm that a representative is properly accredited and authorized to provide the requested services.